Rubric: The Automaton Foundry
[!IMPORTANT] Use observable evidence only. Confidence without a path, diff, command result, trace, or platform record earns no credit.
Scoring
| Criterion | 0 — Missing | 1 — Emerging | 2 — Proficient | 3 — Exemplary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical model | Terms are missing or conflated. | Some terms are correct but boundaries are unclear. | Roles, harnesses, targets, environments, and relevant primitives are separated. | Boundaries and limitations are precise and justified with official documentation. |
| Capability evidence | No adventure-specific artifact or verifier output. | An artifact exists but does not prove the named capability. | The pinned Copilot SDK application and evaluation contract pass node labs/automaton-foundry/verify.js; runtime evidence is recorded when authentication is available. |
The evidence also demonstrates limitations, failure recovery, and independent reproducibility. |
| Ask evidence | No investigation evidence. | Findings are mostly conversational. | Findings cite current repository or platform evidence. | Conflicts and uncertainty are resolved or explicitly carried forward. |
| Plan quality | No bounded plan or reset. | Scope, risks, or checks are incomplete. | Scope, non-goals, risks, verification, review, and reset are defined. | Authority is minimized and dependency, stop, and fallback gates are explicit. |
| Agent execution | No result or fallback. | Work is broad, incomplete, or weakly verified. | Work follows the plan and passes the relevant available check. | Iterations are surgical, evidence-rich, and free of unrelated changes. |
| Failure analysis | Failure exercise skipped. | Failure observed but not explained. | Root cause and recovery are correct. | The lesson becomes a reusable guardrail or decision rule. |
| Review and evidence | No independent review. | Outputs exist without criteria traceability. | Artifacts and checks are reviewed against acceptance criteria. | Evidence is reproducible and another learner can independently verify it. |
| Cleanup | Exercise state remains. | Cleanup is partial. | Reset is complete and clean state is verified. | Credentials, sessions, servers, and cloud resources are also accounted for. |
Required evidence
-
The pinned Copilot SDK application and evaluation contract pass
node labs/automaton-foundry/verify.js; runtime evidence is recorded when authentication is available. -
Source-grounded Ask findings.
-
A bounded Plan with acceptance criteria and reset.
-
Agent output, diff, or documented paper fallback.
-
Relevant verification output.
-
Intentional-failure analysis and recovery.
-
Independent challenge result.
-
Explicit feature-status and availability notes.
-
Verified cleanup record.
Completion rule
- Score at least 16/24 overall.
- Score 2 or higher for Capability evidence, Ask evidence, Plan quality, Agent execution, and Review and evidence.
- Any exposed secret, unapproved destructive action, fabricated result, or unsupported availability claim means not complete, regardless of score.
Reviewer prompts
- Is every important claim tied to current evidence?
- Was the minimum necessary authority used?
- Do the checks observe the requested behavior?
- Are Preview, experimental, and unavailable capabilities labeled accurately?
- Can another learner reproduce both the result and cleanup?
Result
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Total score | /24 |
| Mandatory criteria met | Yes / No |
| Safety disqualifier present | Yes / No |
| Final decision | Complete / Revise |
| Reviewer evidence |